Diagnostic accuracy of ICT- rapid diagnostic tests versus microscopy for malaria: A City-wide study from Karachi

Authors

  • Umber Adnan Karachi Institute of Medical Sciences, Karachi Pakistan
  • Mahadev Harani Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Karachi Pakistan
  • Sadia Talib Karachi Institute of Medical Sciences, Karachi Pakistan
  • Maliha Saad Karachi Institute of Medical Sciences, Karachi Pakistan
  • Tahera Kadir Karachi Institute of Medical Sciences, Karachi Pakistan
  • Bakhtawar Akbar Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Karachi Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55629/pakjpathol.v37i1.980

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of an Immunochromatographic Rapid Diagnostic Test (ICT-RDT) for the diagnosis of malaria, by comparing it with microscopy as the gold standard.

Material and Methods: A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study was conducted from July 20th to November 5th, 2025, at Karachi Institute of Medical Sciences and the Diagnostic and Research Laboratory, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Karachi. Suspected malaria patients were enrolled. Venous blood samples were used for microscopy (thick and thin smears) and ICT-based RDT (HRP2/pLDH). Diagnostic indices (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) were calculated and compared with microscopy.

Results: Of the 341 enrolled patients, 218 (63.9%) had malaria parasite on microscopy. Majority of cases showed Plasmodium vivax (P. vivax) 195 (89.4%), followed by Plasmodium falciparum (P. falciparum) 18(8.2%) and mixed infections 5(2.2%). The ICT-RDT demonstrated a high diagnostic performance with a sensitivity of 94.49%, a specificity of 95.93%, and an accuracy of 95.0%. Sensitivity did not differ significantly between P. vivax and P. falciparum (92.8% vs. 95.6%). However, specificity (96.5% vs. 99.3%, p=0.022) and diagnostic accuracy (94.4% vs. 99.1%, p=0.0005) were significantly higher for P. falciparum. Mixed infections frequently appeared as single-species bands on RDTs.

Conclusion: In this study, the ICT-RDT demonstrated excellent overall performance with high diagnostic accuracy and proved to be a reliable frontline tool for routine clinical practice. However, the tendency to misclassify mixed infections as single-species bands requires careful interpretation.

Keywords: Immunohistographic test, Malaria rapid diagnostic test, Microscopy

References

World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2024 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024 [cited 2025 Oct 2]. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/reports/world-malaria-report-2024

Fatima SH, Zaidi F, Rafiq J, Bhandari D, Ali A, Bi P. Impact of temperatures on malaria incidence in vulnerable regions of Pakistan: empirical evidence and future projections. Epidemiol Infect. 2025; 153: e33.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268825000111

Khan MI, Qureshi H, Bae SJ, Khattak AA, Anwar MS, Ahmad S, et al. Malaria prevalence in Pakistan: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2006–2021). Heliyon. 2023; 9(4): e14822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15373

Shah S, Waris J, Mushtaq H, Khan I, Ali M, Afridi N. Accuracy of rapid diagnostic test for malaria compared to microscopy. Pak Armed Forces Med J 2022; 72(3): 1099-1102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51253/PAFMJ.V72I3.4804

Fatima S, Bashir R, Kumari S, Soomro QA, Kumari Y, Abbasi H. Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by microscopy vs rapid diagnostic test in a tertiary care hospital in Nawabshah. Afr J Biomed Res. 2024; 27: 13527-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/AJBR.v27i4S.6905

Yalley AK, Ocran J, Cobbinah JE, Obodai E, Yankson IK, Kafintu-Kwashie AA, et al. Advances in malaria diagnostic methods in resource-limited settings: a systematic review. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024; 9(9): 190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9090190

Ullah I, Baig RM, Riaz A, Mukhtar M, Khan MA, Zaib A, et al. Fighting malaria in Shangla District, Pakistan: insight into epidemiology, risk factors, and strategic control measures (2020–2024). Malar J. 2025; 24(1): 353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05515-2

Mahende C, Ngasala B, Lusingu J, Yong TS, Lushino P, Lemnge M, et al. Performance of rapid diagnostic test, blood-film microscopy and PCR for the diagnosis of malaria infection among febrile children from Korogwe District, Tanzania. Malar J. 2016; 15(1): 391. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4962396/

Wanja EW, Kuya N, Moranga C, Hickman M, Johnson JD, Moseti C, et al. Field evaluation of diagnostic performance of malaria rapid diagnostic tests in western Kenya. Malar J. 2016; 15: 456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1508-y

World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for malaria [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025 Aug 13 [cited 2025 Oct 2]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2471/B09514

Buderer NM. Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity. Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Sep; 3(9): 895-900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03538.x

Ali R, Asrar M, Sultana S, Sajjad A. A cross-sectional study of malarial patients in district Faisalabad, Pakistan: frequency of infection, species distribution, and diagnostic efficiency comparison. Cyprus J Med Sci. 2025; 10(5): 335-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4274/cjms.2025.2025-38

Harani MS, Beg MA, Khaleeq L, Adil SN, Kakepoto GN, Khurshid M. Role of ICT for rapid diagnosis of malaria. J Pak Med Assoc. 2006; 56(4): 167-71. Available from: http://ecommons.aku.edu/pakistan_fhs_mc_pathol_microbiol/551

Mukry SN, Saud M, Sufaida G, Shaikh K, Naz A, Shamsi TS. Laboratory diagnosis of malaria: comparison of manual and automated diagnostic tests. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2017; 2017: 9286392. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2017/9286392

Matloob HM, Rehman Z, Salam W, Shaquat A, Sonia S, Asghar A. Validity of rapid diagnostic test kit compared with light microscopy in diagnosing malaria among febrile patients. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2022; 16(3): 23.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2216323

Moyeh MN, Ali IM, Njimoh DL, Nji AM, Netongo PM, Evehe MS, et al. Comparison of the Accuracy of Four Malaria Diagnostic Methods in a high transmission setting in coastal Cameroon. J Parasitol Res [serial online]. 2019 [cited 2025 Oct 15]; 2019(1): Article ID 9296435. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9296435

Orimadegun AE, Funwei RI, Michael OS, Ogunkunle OO, Badejo JA, Olusola FI, et al. Comparative evaluation of three histidine-rich protein-2 based rapid diagnostic tests, microscopy and PCR for guiding malaria treatment in Ibadan, Southwest Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract [serial online] 2021 [cited 2025 Oct 17]; 24(4): 496-504. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.nj cp_491_20

Ayogu EE, Ukwe CV, Nna EO. Assessing the reliability of microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests in malaria diagnosis in areas with varying parasite density among older children and adult patients in Nigeria. J Postgrad Med. 2016; 62(3): 150-6. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ articles/PMC4970340/

Betaubun AM, Adiatmaja CO, Butarbutar TV, Wardhani P. Comparison between the diagnostic performances of rapid diagnostic test (RDT) using Advantage Malaria Card Pf/Pv Ag, microscopy, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in malaria suspected patients at the Merauke Regional General Hospital. Res J Pharm Technol. 2003; 16(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00087

Watson OJ, Sumner KM, Janko M, Goel V, Winskill P, Slater HC, et al. False-negative malaria rapid diagnostic test results and their impact on community-based malaria surveys in sub-Saharan Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2019; 4(4). Available from:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6666813/

Cheng Q, Gatton ML, Barnwell J, Chiodini P, McCarthy J, Bell D, et al. Plasmodium falciparum parasites lacking histidine-rich protein 2 and 3: a review and recommendations for accurate reporting. Malar J. 2014; 13: 283.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-283

Rafique N, Naeem MA, Khan M, Asghar MB, Farooq Z, Umar S. Comparative evaluation of available Immuno-chromatographic tests used for detection of Plasmodium species, a tertiary care hospital experience. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2024; 74(3): 853-58. Available from: https://www.pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/7843

Khan SA, Ahmed S, Mushahid N, Anwer M, Saeed S, Khan FA, et al. Comparison of real-time polymerase chain reaction with microscopy and antigen detection assay for the diagnosis of malaria. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013; 23(11): 787-92. Available from: https://www.jcpsp.pk/ archive/2013/Nov2013/06.pdf

Moody A. Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria parasites. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002; 15(1): 66-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.15.1.66-78.2002

Downloads

Published

29-03-2026

How to Cite

1.
Adnan U, Harani M, Talib S, Saad M, Kadir T, Akbar B. Diagnostic accuracy of ICT- rapid diagnostic tests versus microscopy for malaria: A City-wide study from Karachi. Pak J Pathol [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 29 [cited 2026 Oct. 28];37(1):13-8. Available from: https://pakjpath.com/index.php/Pak-J-Pathol/article/view/980