Association between health literacy and glycemic control in urban Vs. rural diabetic patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55629/pakjpathol.v36i4.959Abstract
Objective: The goal of this study was to determine the diagnosis accuracy of the Neutrophilic to Lymphocytic Ratio (NLR) in diagnosing acute appendicitis in terms of the histopathology as a gold standard.
Material and Methods: This cross-sectional validation study was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Federal Government Polyclinic (PGMI) Hospital, Islamabad, from May to November 2025. A total of 276 patients aged 15–60 years with suspected acute appendicitis were enrolled using non-probability consecutive sampling. Inclusion criteria were right iliac fossa pain and tenderness, while patients with autoimmune diseases, chronic infections, prior appendectomy, or antibiotic use were excluded. Preoperative neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were recorded, and all patients underwent emergency appendectomy. Histopathological examination served as the gold standard. The diagnostic performance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at a cutoff of 4.7 was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall accuracy.
Results: Appendicitis was diagnosed using histopathology in 180 (65) patients. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and the general diagnostic accuracy of 90 were obtained with the NLR of 4.7 and above. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.937 which is very high.
Conclusion: An NLR cutoff of ≥4.7 was strongly associated with acute appendicitis. These findings suggest that NLR is a simple, rapid, and cost-effective adjunct to clinical assessment and imaging, particularly in low-resource settings. However, multicenter studies are needed to validate these results and refine diagnostic cutoffs.
Keywords: Acute appendicitis, Diagnostic, Histopathology, Inflammatory, Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.
References
Magliano DJ, Boyko EJ; IDF Diabetes Atlas 10th edition scientific committee. IDF DIABETES ATLAS [Internet]. 10th edition. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2021. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK581934/
Shrestha DB, Budhathoki P, Sedhai YR, Marahatta A, Lamichhane S, Nepal S, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in Nepal from 2000 to 2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis. F1000Research. 2021; 10: 543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53970.2
Whittemore R, Vilar-Compte M, De La Cerda S, Marron D, Conover R, Delvy R, et al. Challenges to diabetes self-management for adults with type 2 diabetes in low-resource settings in Mexico City: a qualitative descriptive study. Int J Equity Health. 2019; 18(1): 133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1035-x
Shahid R, Shoker M, Chu LM, Frehlick R, Ward H, Pahwa P. Impact of low health literacy on patients’ health outcomes: a multicenter cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1): 1148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08527-9
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Quick Guide to Health Literacy. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health; 2020. Available at: https://www.nih.gov/sites/default/files/about-us/publications/quick-guide-healthliteracy.pdf
Ruegg R, Abel T. The relationship between health literacy and health outcomes among male young adults: exploring confounding effects using decomposition analysis. Int J Pub Health. 2019; 64(4): 535-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01236-x
Misra R, Adelman MM, Kirk B, Sambamoorthi U. Relationship among diabetes distress, health literacy, diabetes education, patient-provider communication and diabetes self-care. Am J Health Behavior. 2022; 46(5): 528-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.46.5.4
Parmar J, El Masri A, MacMillan F, McCaffery K, Arora A. Health literacy and medication adherence in adults from ethnic minority backgrounds with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1): 222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20734-z
Wang W, Zhang Y, Lin B, Mei Y, Ping Z, Zhang Z. The urban-rural disparity in the status and risk factors of health literacy: A cross-sectional survey in central China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(11): 3848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113848
Butayeva J, Ratan ZA, Downie S, Hosseinzadeh H. The impact of health literacy interventions on glycemic control and self‐management outcomes among type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. J Diabetes. 2023; 15(9): 724-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.13436
Marshall N, Butler M, Lambert V, Timon CM, Joyce D, Warters A. Health literacy interventions and health literacy-related outcomes for older adults: A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1): 1-3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12457-7
Asharani PV, Lau JH, Roystonn K, Devi F, Peizhi W, Shafie S, et al. Health literacy and diabetes knowledge: a nationwide survey in a multi-ethnic population. Int J n Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(17): 9316.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179316
Guo XM, Zhai X, Hou BR. Adequacy of health literacy and its effect on diabetes self-management: A meta-analysis. Aust J Prim Health. 2021; 26(6): 458-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/py20079
Kianmehr H, Zhang P, Luo J, Guo J, Pavkov ME, Bullard KM, et al. Potential gains in life expectancy associated with achieving treatment goals in US adults with type 2 diabetes. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(4): e227705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7705
Siddique K, Malik RA, Usman A, Ishfaq K, Nadeem MS, Qadir M, et al. Self-care behaviors and glycemic control among older Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in low-income families in Southern Punjab, Pakistan. J Human Behavior Social Environ. 2022; 32(1): 67-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2020.1851843
Wei Y, Chen Y, Zhao Y, Rothman R, Ming J, Wang L, et al. Health literacy and exercise interventions on clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with diabetes: A propensity score-matched comparison. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020; 8(1): e001179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001179
Sørensen K, Pelikan JM, Rothlin F, Ganahl K, Slonska Z, Doyle G, et al. Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). The Eur J Public Health. 2015; 25(6): 1053-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv043
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee: 6. Glycemic targets: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care. 2022; 45(Supplement_1): S83-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-s006
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Naveed Iqbal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Readers may “Share-copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format” and “Adapt-remix, transform, and build upon the material”. The readers must give appropriate credit to the source of the material and indicate if changes were made to the material. Readers may not use the material for commercial purpose. The readers may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
