COMPARISON OF POINT-OF-CARE HEMOGLOBIN A1C TESTING WITH CENTRAL LABORATORY METHOD FOR ITS USE IN SCREENING AND MONITORING OF DIABETES MELLITUS IN A RESOURCE-CONSTRAINED SETTING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55629/pakjpathol.v34i3.788Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the analytical performance of the Point-Of-Care Testing HbA1c analyzer for its use as an alternate to the central/core laboratory method.
Material and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in which 176 samples of HbA1c were analyzed by POCT HbA1c analyzer (A1C EZ 2.0) and central laboratory analyzer (Cobas 6000) as comparative instrument.
Results: Based on the Bland-Altman plot, the HbA1c level for 164 out of 176 (93.18%) subjects analyzed by the POCT-HbA1c was within the range of the 95% limit of agreement. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for clinical diagnosis of diabetes was 0.91. The sensitivity and specificity for HbA1c POCT were 94.5% and 88.0%. Using regression analysis, the slope of the A1C EZ 2.0 vs the Cobas 6000 Analyzer was 0.934, with an intercept of 0.20 and a correlation coefficient of 0.97.
Conclusion: This study concludes that the POCT-HbA1c analyzer is a suitable replacement for central/core laboratory HbA1c measurement. It is useful for screening and monitoring of diabetes mellitus in certain situations especially in a resource constraint setting.
Keywords: Diabetes mellitus, Screening, Monitoring, HbA1c, Point-of-care testing
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sara Reza, Hafiz Muhammad Salman Yousaf, Lubna Sarfraz, Adil Mehmood

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Readers may “Share-copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format” and “Adapt-remix, transform, and build upon the material”. The readers must give appropriate credit to the source of the material and indicate if changes were made to the material. Readers may not use the material for commercial purpose. The readers may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
