Pakistan Journal of Pathology

Current Issue

Vol 29 No 1 (2018)
Published June 11, 2018

Articles

Muhammad Arif Sadiq, Ahmad Muqeem, Asma Bilal, Rizwan Hashim
1-3
FREQUENCY OF GLUCOSE-6-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE (G6PD) DEFICIENCY AMONG THE ASYMPTOMATIC HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS
PDF
Amina Asif, Kanwal Hassan Cheema, Zohaib Ashraf, Muna Malik, Fareeha Imran
4-7
COLISTIN RESISTANCE AMONG GRAM-NEGATIVE NON FERMENTORS ISOLATED FROM PATIENTS AT A TERTIARY CARE REFERRAL BURN CENTRE
PDF
Ayesha Qaiser, Muhammad Zubair, Muhammad Sohail Babar Niazi, Waqarul Hassan Zaidi, Salma Gul
8-11
ROLE OF FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY AND THYROID SCINTIGRAPHY IN EVALUATION OF SOLITARY THYROID NODULE; A COMPARATIVE STUDY
PDF
Muna Malik, Iffat Javed, Saeed Anwar, Sohaila Mushtaq, Fahd Kamal Akhtar
12-16
PATTERN OF CAUSATIVE ORGANISMS IN INFECTIVE KERATITIS IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
PDF
Rifat Nadeem Ahmad, Mahwish Majid Bhatti, Asna Haroon Khan
17-21
TEACHING PATHOLOGY TO MEDICAL UNDERGRADUATES IN AN INTEGRATED MODULAR CURRICULUM
PDF

Case Report

Akhter Ali Bajwa, Hafeez Ud Din, Muhammad Tahir Khadim, Syed Salman Ali, Unaiza Jamil, Umair Aslam Shahzad Khan
22-24
PRIMARY BONE LYMPHOMA: A CASE REPORT OF A 22 YEAR YOUNG MALE AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE
PDF
View All Issues

Focus and Scope

It is policy of the Pakistan Journal of Pathology (PJP) to publish articles pertaining to Pathology providing sufficient contribution to medical knowledge. The journal is presently being published quarterly. The articles may include, original research, review articles, case reports, retrospective analysis of data, and new experimental methods of medical importance. PJP is peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of histopathology, haematology, chemical pathology, microbiology, virology, and immunology. It is journal policy to publish work deemed by peer reviewers to be a coherent and sound addition to scientific knowledge.

Peer Review Process

Peer review is the critical assessment of manuscripts submitted to journals by experts who are not part of the editorial staff. Peer review can therefore be viewed as an important extension of the scientific process. It is the policy of PJP that every article received for publication is peer reviewed by at least two senior specialists of the concerned specialty. The "double blind" process is strictly followed. PJP operates an 'open peer review' policy meaning reviewers are asked to sign their reviews. In certain controversial cases, the opinion of a 3rd reviewer is also obtained. In case of conflict of opinion between the two reviewers, the matter is referred to the Chief-editor

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.