EFFICACY OF CEFTAROLINE AGAINST METHICILLIN RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate in vitro efficacy of Ceftaroline against Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated in our setup.
Material and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out at Department of Microbiology, Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi from November 2018 to April 2019. Clinical samples from respiratory tract, blood, pus, urine and various catheter tips were inoculated on Blood, MacConkey’s agar and Incubated at 37ᵒC for 18 to 24h. Staphylococcus aureus was identified by standard microbiological procedures. Methicillin resistance of isolated Staphylococci was detected by agar disk diffusion method (Kirby-Bauer) according to CLSI guideline. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) were determined for ceftaroline and vancomycin by using the Epsilon-test (E-test) method. S.aureus ATCC29213 was used as control strain for MIC detection.
Results: Total of 55 samples were included according to the inclusion criteria of the study. Frequencies and percentages of sensitive, intermediate and resistant organisms according to MIC of ceftaroline against MRSA isolates were 52(94.5%), 3(5.4%) and 0 respectively. MIC when calculated according to CLSI guidelines, MIC50 and MIC90 for ceftaroline against MRSA isolates was 0.75 and 1µg/ml respectively.
Conclusion: We can safely conclude that in vitro ceftaroline is more effective than vancomycin against MRSA.
Key Words: Ceftaroline, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Minimum inhibitory concentration.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Irum Aftab, Umme Farwa, Fatima Kaleem, Hamza Riaz, Mehnaz Khattak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Readers may “Share-copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format” and “Adapt-remix, transform, and build upon the material”. The readers must give appropriate credit to the source of the material and indicate if changes were made to the material. Readers may not use the material for commercial purpose. The readers may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.